• Home
• Basic Repertoire
• Composers
• Books and Scores
• Reviews and Articles
• Buying Guide
• Music Links 

Related Links

Recommended Links

Site News

What's New for
Winter 2018/2019?

Site Search

Follow us on
   

Affiliates

---

CD Review

Anton Bruckner

Symphony #3

BBC Northern Symphony Orchestra/Kurt Sanderling
Live performance from City Hall, Newcastle upon Tyne, 21 April 1978
ICA Classics ICAC5005 69:26

The 3^rd Symphony is perhaps the most flawed and certainly the most revised of Bruckner's symphonies (there are between 3 and 6 versions, depending on how you count). The original 1873 version, disastrously received at its first performance in 1877, was not published until Nowak's 1977 edition, which based on Wagner's fair copy of the score that had been dedicated to him. There has been more of a vogue recently for performing this original version (see, e.g., Norrington's recording on Hänssler Classic 93.217), but Kurt Sanderling here follows the majority in performing the 1889 revision, edited by Nowak in 1959.

Robert Simpson is not an enthusiast for the 3^rd Symphony, which he describes in his wonderful book The Essence of Bruckner as "the weakest of Bruckner's numbered symphonies". Simpson's objections are primarily structural, and it is true that performances of the 3^rd typically fail to bring out a compelling architecture. It is to Sanderling's credit, though, that this performance does communicate a musical inner logic. In the first movement Sanderling's steady tempi are key, as his disinclination to luxuriate in Bruckner's more bombastic moments. The Adagio has more weight, but remains in balance with the first movement. Sanderling and the BBC Northern Symphony (soon to be renamed the BBC Philharmonic) bring out the lyrical depths of the movement, with steady tempi once again. The juxtaposition of the Scherzo and the Trio is very effective, and sets things up nicely for the split personality of the finale, with a funereal chorale and a sprightly polka running through it (and combined in the famous "double theme").

All in all this is a fine performance, which makes a good case for the 1889 revision, despite the by and large justified criticisms of Simpson and others. Sanderling is a fine Brucknerian (see my review of his December 1999 Stuttgart 7^th on Hänssler Classic 94.604). It is unfortunate that the included ten-minute interview by Piers Burton-Page does not touch upon Bruckner. The exchange is interesting nonetheless. If there is a fault, it is in the rather dry acoustics of the Newcastle City Hall, but the ear should soon adjust. Recommended.

Copyright © 2012, José Luis Bermúdez